<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FMD : Multiple uncertainties hide underpriced stock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogvesting.com/2007/09/24/fmd-multiple-uncertainties-hide-underpriced-stock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogvesting.com/2007/09/24/fmd-multiple-uncertainties-hide-underpriced-stock/</link>
	<description>Articles on value investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mumu</title>
		<link>http://www.blogvesting.com/2007/09/24/fmd-multiple-uncertainties-hide-underpriced-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>mumu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogvesting.com/2007/fmd-multiple-uncertainties-hide-underpriced-stock/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s nice to read an FMD valuation from someone who clearly understands the various moving parts, very unlike the sober analysts that typically follow this stock.  the misunderstanding of this company seems well spread, with one analyst even wanting to price it like a thrift!

also, thanks for the two-tone valuation, with the &quot;probable year&quot; vs the &quot;everything has gone wrong year&quot; showing us what knowledgeable fans like Tom Brown must be seeing in their own internal analyses -- that this company in the low 30s was priced as if every conceivable worry was sure to become reality.  so far, absolutely none of the short-term analyst fears have come to pass. remember that the argument that clients JPM or BOA will be inevitably leaving has been made for years now!  gee, someday they just may be correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s nice to read an FMD valuation from someone who clearly understands the various moving parts, very unlike the sober analysts that typically follow this stock.  the misunderstanding of this company seems well spread, with one analyst even wanting to price it like a thrift!</p>
<p>also, thanks for the two-tone valuation, with the &#8220;probable year&#8221; vs the &#8220;everything has gone wrong year&#8221; showing us what knowledgeable fans like Tom Brown must be seeing in their own internal analyses &#8212; that this company in the low 30s was priced as if every conceivable worry was sure to become reality.  so far, absolutely none of the short-term analyst fears have come to pass. remember that the argument that clients JPM or BOA will be inevitably leaving has been made for years now!  gee, someday they just may be correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stockjoe</title>
		<link>http://www.blogvesting.com/2007/09/24/fmd-multiple-uncertainties-hide-underpriced-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Stockjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogvesting.com/2007/fmd-multiple-uncertainties-hide-underpriced-stock/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s one of the best analysis of FMD I have read. I agree with you 100%. Good Job. I&#039;m looking for an entry between 30-36 if possible since it has resistance at the 39-40 level and support around 30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one of the best analysis of FMD I have read. I agree with you 100%. Good Job. I&#8217;m looking for an entry between 30-36 if possible since it has resistance at the 39-40 level and support around 30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
